I was asked the difference between bodhi and prajna.  They are both translated as wisdom and though my brain has different connections for these two words I could not say that they have different meanings.  Whether bodhi or prajna, this wisdom is key to the Buddha's  experience of Enlightenment.  In the Zen tradition it is said that the Buddha immediately after his experience of Enlightenment said "All beings without exception have this same wisdom to which I have just been opened."
          How could all people be inherently wise?  What about psychopaths, or the simply stupid?  In Buddhism we say that most of us live in ignorance of this inherent wisdom which is obscured by our ignorant and misguided thinking,  never the less this wisdom is still present.  This sets Buddhism apart from most other religions in believing that all people have an inherent goodness even if their behavior doesn't show it. 
          What the Buddha discovered is that if we simply clear our minds of our ignorant thinking then a clear mind will emerge with the most basic understanding of our place in the Universe. This is the wisdom which we all have even if normally obscured.  Of course clearing our minds of our ignorant thinking is not simple,  It may be a simple idea but not simple to actualize, that is why we practice and practice and practice.  And it is not so simple as just learning to stop thinking for a few moments in meditation, though this is getting close.  But then when it happens, and it is usually quite dramatic, the mind of wisdom will emerge which is quiet, and joyous, and humerus, filled with love and compassion, and a completely different understanding of things.  This is the awakening of bodhi.  This is the awakening of prajna.

          Hi Folks, this weekend Janet and I went to a meditation and talk by a Theravadin nun and teacher.  I enjoyed the talk.  It focused on the essentials of non-attachment and rooting from our minds the defilemens of greed, anger, and ignorance, and how this opens up our minds to love.  All very good and essential Buddhism.  During the question and answer period all the questions focused on individual problems.  This reminded me of the different types of people that seem to be attracted to the different forms of Buddhism.  In general though certainly not for all, the Theravadin movement in this country has become a form of therapy for personal problems.  There is nothing wrong with this though I agree with Suzuki Roshi when he said that Buddhism will never be a permanent part of American society until it is seen as religion and not just therapy and philosophy.
       Theravada is the most conservative form of Buddhism in that it only accepts as canonical, teachings and Sutras that most likely go back to the original teachings of Shakyamuni Buddha.  This purity is attractive but the 2500 years of development in Buddhism by many hundreds of enlightened teachers is for the most part ignored.  Though we should revere Shakyamuni as a great spiritual teacher and the founder of this thing we call Buddhism, we also should recognize him as a human who was also limited and imperfect as all humans must be.
          The nun said only one thing that I objected to.  She gave the party line on reincarnation.  She said that we will reincarnate again and again until all our individual karma is cleansed and then at last we no longer return.  This is a very old idea, current in India long before Shakyaimuni and Buddhism.  Shakyamuni asked us not to take any of his teachings as true until we have tested them in meditation or the other activities of life.  Reincarnation is hard to test and Shakyamuni did his best to avoid talking about it.  Only when pressed would he compare reincarnation to one candle lighting another, a very vague discription.  Though we all want to continue in some way after we die and we also want to know we live in a moral universe I think it is better that this party line view of reincarnation be left out of Buddhism.  It is not necessary.
          In Zen a clear experience and  understanding  of our "True Self" is considered a mark of Enlightenment.  Understanding our True Self is to understand our place in the Universe.  With this understanding comes an understanding of what happens when we die.  But this understanding is not about us as individuals in our normal dualistic way of thinking.  The experience of Enlightenment is an opening into a non-dual experience and understanding of the Universe.  This non-dual understanding is not in accord with the party line on reincarnation.  Yet, reincarnation should not be completely dismissed, but rather seen through the light of the non-dual.  This is poetic liberation.  (See earlier blog).  It is up to us as individual practitioners to test this understanding.